Legal Opinion
DIAZ v. the STATE.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 23, 2018No. A18A1394PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rickman, Judge.
*250 *256 Hipolito G. Diaz was tried by a jury and convicted of felony theft by receiving stolen property. On appeal, Diaz contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction because the State failed to prove venue beyond a reasonable doubt and that the trial court erred by excluding a defense witness' testimony. For the following reasons we affirm.
On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to support the jury's verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. We do not weigh the evidence or judge…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Cushenberry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- Ramos v. TerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re A. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- In the Interest of H. J., a Child (Mother)Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2025