Continental Gin Co. v. Murray Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Tn Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Delaware.
1Opinion of the Court
MOODY, Circuit Justice.
The defendant in error, the Murray Company, brought suit against the plaintiff in error, the Continental Gin Company, in the Circuit Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of patents. In obedience to the mandate of this court (149 Fed. 989), the Circuit Court entered an interlocutory decree for the Murray Company against the Continental Company for an injunction and account. Of this decree the other plaintiffs in error had due notice. The injunction commanded the defendants, its agents, officers, and servants, to desist from making, using, or selling, *874…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Martinton v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Suydam v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Merchants' Stock & Grain Co. v. Board of Trade of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- In re GroveCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Phillips Sheet & Tin Plate Co. v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Iron, Steel & Tin WorkersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1913
- Gompers v. Buck's Stove & Range Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1909