Legal Opinion

Kirk v. Grossman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1932No. 30,220Published

1Opinion of the Court

*695The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action in justice court on a note. Judgment was for plaintiff. Garnishment proceedings were had at the same time. The garnishee answered that he had a certain amount of money in his possession, but that he did not know to whom it belonged. Plaintiff gave notice to the justice that the answer of the garnishee “was and is unsatisfactory.” Defendant filed a motion asking that the garnishee be discharged because the money that the garnishee held belonged to parties other than defendant. One of the parties asked permission of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Plainville Mill & Elevator Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API