Legal Opinion

Neal v. Wood

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1864PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Jefferson Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

Ray, Ch. J.

Action by the appellees against the appellants as indorsers of certain bills of exchange. The complaint avers that, at the time of the transfer to appellees, the following waiver was entered on each hill:

*524“Botice, demand, protest, and due diligence waived on account of the war and insurrection.
“J. S. &B. E. Beal.”

The complaint set out the hills of exchange by copy, alleged acceptance by the drawees, the waiver and nonpayment. Demurrers were filed and overruled to each paragraph of the complaint. It is insisted that the waiver is conditional in its terms, and that the complaint…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pool v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Lowry v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Fitch v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. State ex rel. Parks v. HughesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Burgettstown National Bank v. NillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API