Legal Opinion
United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 27, 1950No. 10094_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
183 F.2d 369
UNITED STATES,
v.
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY R. CO.
No. 10094.
United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.
June 27, 1950.
Leo Meltzer, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Otto Kerner, Jr., U.S. Atty., Benjamin D. Caruso, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., James M. McInerney, Asst. Atty. Gen., John Peter Lulinski, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Illinois (Henry J. Vinskey, Attorney, Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for appellant.
C. W. Krohl, Andrew C. Scott, Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Before FINNEGAN, LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges.
LINDLEY, Circuit…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1925
- United States v. Spokane International Ry. Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1928
- United States v. New Orleans, T. & M. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
- United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950