Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Taylor v. West Virginia Department of Health & Human resources

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 2016No. 14-0679Published

1ConcurrenceChief Justice Ketchum

I agree with the majority that the plaintiffs failed to identify how them discharges contra*571vened the Ethics Act. They have no retaliatory discharge claim based on the Ethics Act. However, it is clear that the plaintiffs can, in fact, assert a valid retaliatory discharge claim under our Procurement Statute- and should be permitted to amend their pleadings to conform to the evidence in this case. It is plain from the evidence that there is a substantial public policy relating to the plaintiffs’ discharges under the statutory procurement procedures contained in West Virginia Code § 5A-3-1 et…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosier v. Garron, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Bradshaw v. SoulsbyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. SE/Z Construction, L.L.C. v. Idaho State UniversityIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Wiseman Construction Co. v. Maynard C. Smith Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API