Legal Opinion
Davila v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided October 21, 2004No. 13-03-483-CR, 13-03-502-CRPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Opinion by
Justice BAIRD (Assigned).
Appellants were charged by indictment with the offense of capital murder. The State did not seek the death penalty. Appellants were tried jointly and convicted by a jury of the charged offense. The trial judge automatically assessed punishment at confinement for life in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division. We affirm.
I. Sufficiency Challenges.
Each appellant challenges the legal and factual sufficiency to support their respective convictions. We will begin with a summary of the evidence adduced at trial,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Belen Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
- Belen Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
- Cecilio Mendoza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
- Cecilio Mendoza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
- Daniel Gonzalez Castaneda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.