Legal Opinion

Converse v. Fitzpatrick

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1914No. 6033Published

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division ‘0,” No. 105,043. Hon. E. K. Skinner, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

His Honor, CHARLES F. CLAIBORNE,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

On June 15th, 1908, the State Tax Collector, acting-under Act 85 of 1888, and 106 of 1890, and 170 of 1898, took a rule against Converse & Co., in which he alleged that the said Converse & Co., were indebted unto the State of Louisiana in the sum of $180 with two per cent per month interest from January 1st, 1908, until paid and costs, for taxes for the year 1907, on an assessment on money loaned at interest, credits, -and bills receivable, and money in possession or on deposit, $30,000.00; and the said…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Perry County v. Selma, Marion & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. National Bank v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Richardson v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. City of Oakland v. WhippleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API