Legal Opinion

G. W. Van Dusen & Co. v. Piper

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff (a corporation) from an order of the district court for Blue Earth county, Severance, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

There was very little contention over the facts upon the trial of this action. Plaintiff, a corporation dealing in grain, had advanced money to Mitchell and Jefferson, who were buying, selling, and shipping the same article, under the firm name of Southern Minnesota Elevator Company, to use in their business. On December 1, 1888,' plaintiff sent one Eagg, its agent, to Jefferson, the managing man of the elevator company, with a statement of account, which was then agreed upon as correct. It was also agreed that plaintiff should have all of the grain then in the firm elevators and warehouses.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank of Litchfield v. ElliottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Dumphy v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API