Legal Opinion
In Re Newberry
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California
Decided February 18, 1988No. 19-02019PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
LOREN S. DAHL, Chief Judge.
The objection to confirmation by creditor, The Regents of the University of California (The Regents), to the Chapter 13 plan of Patrick Newberry (Newberry) was heard before this court on November 10, 1987. Eric K. Behrens, Esq., appeared and argued on behalf of objecting creditor, The Regents. W. Scott de Bie of the Law Offices of Max Cline appeared and argued on behalf of the debtor, Newberry. The court having considered the proceedings and other documents filed herein and the argument of counsel, makes the following factual…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Ronald Estus and Doris Estus, Debtors. United States of America v. Ronald EstusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- In Re Charles E. Kitchens and Olivia L. Kitchens, Bankrupt. Charles E. Kitchens and Olivia L. Kitchens v. Georgia Railroad Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Margaret Ann Deans v. Gerald O'donnell, Trustee, in Re Margaret Ann DeansCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co. v. Kull (In Re Kull)District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of BeltUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
- In Re SaulterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1991
- In Re ColferUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1993
- In Re SimmonsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2003
- In Re ChristopheUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.