Legal Opinion

Richardson v. . Redd

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Civil action, tried before Norwood, P, at January Term, 1896, of Rockingham Superior Court. The action was brought for the purpose of having a receiver appointed for the Boyd Manufacturing Company, (a partnership composed — before its dissolution by the death of A. J. Boyd— of A. J. Boyd, S. H. Boyd, G. D. Boyd, and Mrs T. A. Richardson,) and to restrain the execution sale of partnership property by the defendant Bank of Reids-ville, on a judgment rendered in 1894. The…

Read the full summary

Civil action, tried before Norwood, P, at January Term, 1896, of Rockingham Superior Court. The action was brought for the purpose of having a receiver appointed for the Boyd Manufacturing Company, (a partnership composed — before its dissolution by the death of A. J. Boyd— of A. J. Boyd, S. H. Boyd, G. D. Boyd, and Mrs T. A. Richardson,) and to restrain the execution sale of partnership property by the defendant Bank of Reids-ville, on a judgment rendered in 1894. The defendant Redd is administrator of A. J. Boyd, deceased. A receiver was appointed, a reference made to ascertain the…

1Opinion of the Court

Furches, J.:

A. J. Boyd, S. TI. Boyd, G. D. Boyd and Mi’s. T. A. Richardson were the individual members composing the partnership of the Boyd Manufacturing Company. A. J. Boyd is dead and the partnership is insolvent. The Bank of Reidsville has recovered a judgment against the concern for a partnership debt, sued out execution, and is trying to enforce its collection by a sale of the partnership property. S. H. Boyd and G. D. Boyd each claim their personal property exemptions out of the partnership effects, and have each assented to the other’s doing so. But Mrs. Richardson and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burns & Smucker v. Harris & AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  2. State Ex Rel. Scott & Burton v. KenanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Stout v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re SeaboltDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1902
  2. Bristol Grocery Co. v. BailsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. In re GrimesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1899
  4. Farmer v. . HeadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. In re Aurora Hardware Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API