Legal Opinion

Savannah Electric Co. v. Tuck

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Practice in the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.

1. Formerly it was beld that when a record was transmitted by the clerk of the superior court to this court after the time in which the law required him to do so had elapsed, the case would be dismissed. Then provision was made for requiring prompt performance by him of his duty in that regard. As early as 1870 an act was passed declaring that no case should be dismissed because of • a delay in transmission of the record, provided it reached the Supreme Court in time to be heard at the term to which it was returnable. Doubtless to prevent a failure on the part of the clerk of the trial court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Berry v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Farrar v. OglesbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  3. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. BurwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Atlanta National Building & Loan Ass'n v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Davis v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Byrd v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Earnhart v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Fuqua v. HaddenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Hines v. JollyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API