Legal Opinion

Binsfeld v. Conrad

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 23, 2004No. 03-1077PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOVER, RJ.

¶ 1. Donald Binsfeld appeals a summary judgment concluding that Donald Conrad was not liable under Wisconsin's safe place statute, Wis. Stat. § 101.11, 1 for Binsfeld's work-related injuries. Binsfeld also appeals the circuit court's denial of a motion for default judgment, arguing that Conrad did not show excusable neglect sufficient to justify filing his answer four days after the deadline. We conclude that the circuit court appropriately exercised its discretion by denying the default judgment and that the safe place statute does not apply to Conrad. We therefore áffirm the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hartung v. HartungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Schwenn v. Loraine Hotel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Dykstra v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of Otto Ex Rel. Otto v. Physicians Insurance Co. of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  2. Friendly Village Nursing and Rehab, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce DevelopmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Friendly Village Nursing and Rehab, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce DevelopmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Keene v. SippelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API