Legal Opinion

Stacy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 21, 1915No. 3425Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

In the submission of this case we understood appellant, through his attorneys, conceded that the only questions necessary to be decided were those discussed in the original opinion.

However, his attorneys claim that while they only presented those questions in oral argument at the time, none of the others were waived but were relied upon. It, therefore, becomes necessary to now pass on all these questions.

We have again reviewed the case and all the questions in it and are confirmed in the opinion that no reversible error was committed by the trial court.

We will state succinctly the material…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Byrd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. McMillan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Mixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Valigura v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API