Legal Opinion

Willetts v. Whitson

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to compel the purchaser at a partition sale to complete his purchase.

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

In this action for the partition of property located in Queens county a sale was made by James W. Treadwell, Esq., the referee, on the 4th day of May, 1910, for the total sum of $174,754.96, ten per cent, of the amount being paid on deposit. The plaintiff, Annette W. Willetts, and her brother, D'aniel Whitson, were each entitled by the-judgment of partition to one-third of the proceeds of the sale and both were present when the sale took place. Through their attorney, Wilson M. Powell, and the auctioneer, Joseph P. Day, these parties offered to make to the purchaser a loan on the premises and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Winkle v. . Van WinkleNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Koop v. BurrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Dunn v. HerbsNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Fairchild v. FairchildNew York Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eckhardt v. DompierMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Leahy v. LeahyNew York Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API