Cravelyn Hooker v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.
The circuit court denied a defendant’s unequivocal request to represent himself because he was not “qualified” to do so by his “training, education, and experience.” This ruling violated the defendant’s right to self-representation under Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). We reverse the judgment of conviction and remand for a new trial.
Cravelyn Hooker was charged with a form of sexual battery contrary to section 794.011(8)(b), Florida Statutes (2010). After a jury trial, he was convicted of the lesser included offense of lewd or lascivious battery.
Severa…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- McCray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Tennis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Losada v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Loor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- ERSKINE MCKINLEY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Luke Petruschke v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Dominic M. Bland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.