Legal Opinion

Neil v. Stuart

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1918No. 21,180PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Republic district court; John C. Hogin, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

This.case involves the construction of a will; the question being whether certain devisees shall take by families or individually. The only error complained of, aside from the per stirpes construction, is the refusal to receive the evidence of the scrivener ás to what the testatrix said her intentions and desires were concerning the interests of the devisees.

Jennet Neil married John Neil, and in December, 1877, a deed was made to them jointly for one tract of land now in controversy. Her husband died in 1879, and in 1881 she married his…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. DoolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Kistler v. Fitzpatrick Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Estate of RauschenplatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Elam v. LeachCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. Estate of BackestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API