In re Nylen
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Per curiam
Terrance Dale Nylen (“Nylen”) appeals the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“board”), which affirmed the final rejection of claims 1-12 of Nylen’s application, Ser. No. 09/392,552. In re Nylen, No.2002-1979 (May 22, 2003). We affirm.
We review the decision that Nylen’s device is obvious de novo, while we review the board’s underlying findings of fact for substantial evidence. See In re Bass, 314 F.3d 575, 576 (Fed.Cir.2002). Nylen’s ap*294plication claims a mode of applying herbicide to weeds. His device combines an applicator bottle, or roll-on applicator in the case of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- In Re David C. PaulsenCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- In Re Denis Rouffet, Yannick Tanguy and Frederic BerthaultCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Sibia Neurosciences, Inc. v. Cadus Pharmaceutical Corporation,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- In Re Carl D. ClayCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Joe Sotelo v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of OklahomaBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2017