Legal Opinion

Haworth v. Ruckman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

(Pro Tempore).

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s directed verdict based upon defendant’s motion and contention that this personal injury action is barred by the statute of limitations.

The injury occurred on June 6, 1962, and this action was commenced on January 12, 1966. The action would be barred by the two-year tort statute of limitations (ORS 12.110(1)) unless it is saved by ORS 12.220.

Plaintiff started his first action on October 16, 1963, and took a voluntary nonsuit before trial on January 12, 1965.

ORS 12.220 provides:

“* * * [I]f an action is commenced within the time prescribed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Quick v. AndresenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Warn v. Brooks-Scanlon, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hatley v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ram Technical Services, Inc. v. KoreskoOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Pakos v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Fuller v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API