Legal Opinion
Matter of Cook v. New York Central Railroad Company
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 23, 1946PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ. FULD, J., dissents on the ground that the voluntary and gratuitous payment of drug or medical bills is not "payment * * * of compensation previously awarded" within the meaning of section 25-a of the Workmen's Compensation Law. Taking no part: DYE, J.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Claim of Lombardo v. Endicott Johnson Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
- Claim of Lopa v. Brillo Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Claim of Pollock v. ShoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946