McGovern v. McClintic-Marshall Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action at law by the McClintic-Marshall Company against Patrick McGovern and Charles E. Perrin. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff below has recovered a judgment of $35,100.96 damages and costs in an action brought to recover a balance due upon a contract between the plaintiff below and the defendants below for furnishing and fabricating, by the plaintiff below, structural steel for a part of route 61 of the Broadway-Fourth Avenue Rapid Transit Railroad which was constrxicted in the city of New York according to the pláxis and specifications furnished by the Pxxblic Service Coxnmission.
The first cause of action of the complaint alleged the making of a contract whereby the plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Slaughter's Administrator v. GersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Howland v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Atlantic Delaine Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. BelliwithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Keeton v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
- Hunt v. Triplex Safety Glass Co. of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Rainbow Light, Inc. v. Claude Neon Lights, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Kearns-Gorsuch Bottle Co. v. Hartford-Fairmont Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- Palmberg v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1924