Legal Opinion

Craighead County v. Humphrey, State Auditor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 17, 1949No. 4-8672Published

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Bose Smith, J.

This case is a sequel to Clayton v. City of Little Rock, 211 Ark. 893, 204 S. W. 2d 145. There we held that Act 104 of 1945 did not effectively appropriate money in the Municipal Bond Betirement Fund. The result was that an unappropriated sum of $48,444.64 remained in that fund at the end of the biennium on June 30, 1947. Appellant filed this action to compel the State Treasurer to credit that money to the Municipal Turnback Fund, pending future disposition by the General Assembly. Various paving districts intervened below and as appellees here urge that the money should remain in thé Bond…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clayton, State Treasurer v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API