Legal Opinion

State v. Neasby

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 16, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

,Appeal from Douglas Circuit Court. — Hon. Asbury Burkhead, Judge. The evidence supports the verdict in that it shows clearly that India Hatfield was under the age of eighteen years and that she was living at the home of her father, and was prevailed upon by the defendant to go with him to Arkansas. State v. Bobbst, 131 Mo. 328.

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.

In an information filed by the prosecuting attorney of Douglas county, on the 13th of October, 1902, in the circuit court of said county, the defendant was charged with unlawfully and feloniously taking India Hatfield, a female under the age of eighteen and over the age of fifteen years from her father, William Hatfield, he, the said William Hatfield, then and there having the legal charge of the person of said India Hatfield, for the purpose of concubinage with him, the said George Neasby, against the peace and dignity of the State; and James Turner, Annie Turner, and Victory Williams were…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beckham v. NackeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  2. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  4. State v. BowmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BeverlySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API