Clow v. Pittsburgh Traction Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 61, Oct. T., 1893, by-defendant, from judgment oí C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co.,.Feb. T., 1892, No. 721, on verdict for plaintiff, Mary Clow. Trespass for personal injuries. Before McClung, J. At the trial it appeared that on May 16, 1891,' plaintiff was a passenger on one of defendant’s cable cars on Fifth avenue, Pittsburgh.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 61, Oct. T., 1893, by-defendant, from judgment oí C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co.,.Feb. T., 1892, No. 721, on verdict for plaintiff, Mary Clow. Trespass for personal injuries. Before McClung, J. At the trial it appeared that on May 16, 1891,' plaintiff was a passenger on one of defendant’s cable cars on Fifth avenue, Pittsburgh. When the car reached the vault in front of the company’s power house near Washington street it was suddenly and without warning stopped, and plaintiff was thrown forward, sustaining fracture of the clavicle and other injuries. Evidence for plaintiff showed that…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We find no error in this record that would justify a reversal of the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Sever v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Kepner v. Harrisburg Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Palmer v. Warren Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Furby v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926