Legal Opinion

Cardillo v. Qualsure Insurance Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 20, 2008No. 4D06-4422PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

STONE, J.

We deny Cardillo’s motion for rehearing, but withdraw our opinion of November 21, 2007 and substitute the following:

Affirmed. The trial court correctly concluded that Cardillo’s motion for attorney’s fees was untimely. The trial court’s December 1st order was a declaratory judgment that entitled Cardillo to attorney’s fees and triggered the thirty-day time limitation in rule 1.525 for serving a motion for attorney’s fees. Cardillo asserts that the order was a non-final order and, therefore, did not commence the time limitation.

Simon initially sued Cardillo for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Canal Insurance Company v. ReedSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Legion Ins. Co. v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Getman v. Tracey Construction, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Eco Green International LLC v. Acapital, S.R.ODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  3. Hernando County, Florida v. Hernando County Fair Association, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  4. Myers v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  5. Patrick Fabre v. 4647 Block, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API