Legal Opinion

Gold Sound, Inc. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1949PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtValente, J.

This is a motion by the defendants under subdivision 5 of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint in an action for a declaratory judgment and a permanent injunction oh the ground that the complaint does not allege sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action. The plaintiffs, except the plaintiff Jerome Gold, who are engaged in the business of renting ‘ ‘ sound trucks ’ ’ and manufacturing and selling “ sound trucks ” and amplifying devices and equipment, respectively, seek to have adjudged invalid as unconstitutional and to enjoin the enforcement of Local Law No.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Cox v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Saia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jaffe Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Rose v. City of New RochelleNew York Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Thompson v. LomenzoNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Central Westchester Humane Society, Inc. v. HilleboeNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Al Walker, Inc. v. Borough of StanhopeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API