Gold Sound, Inc. v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtValente, J.
This is a motion by the defendants under subdivision 5 of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint in an action for a declaratory judgment and a permanent injunction oh the ground that the complaint does not allege sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action. The plaintiffs, except the plaintiff Jerome Gold, who are engaged in the business of renting ‘ ‘ sound trucks ’ ’ and manufacturing and selling “ sound trucks ” and amplifying devices and equipment, respectively, seek to have adjudged invalid as unconstitutional and to enjoin the enforcement of Local Law No.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Cox v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Saia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jaffe Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.New York Supreme Court · 1966
- Rose v. City of New RochelleNew York Supreme Court · 1953
- Thompson v. LomenzoNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Central Westchester Humane Society, Inc. v. HilleboeNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Al Walker, Inc. v. Borough of StanhopeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.