Legal Opinion
Van Susteren v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 6, 2003No. 01-57210PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
331 F.3d 1024
Adam VAN SUSTEREN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Bill JONES, in his official capacity as California Secretary of State; Mikel Haas, in his official capacity as Registrar of Voters; Sally McPherson, in her official capacity as Registrar of Voters for the County of San Diego, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-57210.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 10, 2003.
Filed June 6, 2003.
Adam Van Susteren, Pro Se, San Diego, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.
Susan R. Oie, Deputy Attorney General of the State of California, Sacramento, California, for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tashjian v. Republican Party of ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rosario v. RockefellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Van Susteren v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nader v. CroninCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State v. Alaska Democratic PartyAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Whitfield v. ThurstonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020