Legal Opinion
At&T, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 6, 2018No. 15-1038; C/w 16-1002, 16-1072PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pillard, Circuit Judge:
The Federal Communications Commission has, since the agency's inception, been charged to ensure that everyone in the United States has access to critical telecommunications services. This mandate is effected through a system of federal subsidies to certain designated carriers that are required to offer essential services to underserved consumers. Recognizing the changing technological landscape, the Commission is currently in the process of expanding those services that must be universally accessible beyond landline telephone service to include broadband and cellular…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Metropcs California, LLC v. Michael PickerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Sagarwala v. CissnaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Tri-County Telephone Association, Inc. v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Inteliquent, Inc. v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Venture Comm. Co-Op, Inc. v. James Valley Co-Op Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.