G.M. Battery & Boat Co. v. L.K.N. Corp.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1DissentWelliver, Judge
I respectfully dissent. The principal opinion abandons the most fundamental concept of fire and hazard insurance law which is that
[a]s a prerequisite to the enforcement of an insurance contract, public policy demands that the insured have an insurable interest in the property both at the time of making the contract and at the time of loss. Prewitt v. Continental Insurance Co., 538 S.W.2d 902, 905 (Mo.App.1976); Galati v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 381 S.W.2d 5, 9 (Mo.App.1964); Estes v. Great American Insurance Co.,d 112 S.W.2d 153, 156 (Mo.App.1938). The requirement of insurable interest is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- DeWitt v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company v. Stanley C. Edmister and Dorothy Mae EdmisterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Prewitt v. Continental Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- G.M. Battery & Boat Co. v. L.K.N. Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- Galati v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.