Legal Opinion

State v. Maloy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 11, 1997No. 96-04269PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHATLEY, Judge.

The state filed this appeal from the trial court’s order granting Virgil Maloy’s motion to suppress statements he made to police after his arrest. Maloy then filed a cross-appeal challenging the denial of his motion to suppress cocaine, which he claims was obtained pursuant to an unlawful search. We do not find merit in the issues Maloy raises in his cross-appeal and affirm the denial of his motion to suppress the cocaine without discussion. However, we conclude that the trial court erred in granting Maloy’s motion to suppress his statements and reverse.

The trial court found…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Gerald Lee EdmondsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Reilly v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Jancar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API