Legal Opinion

Mandola v. Mariotti

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 6, 1977No. 16921PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Chief Justice.

This is a suit to recover damages by reason of injuries sustained in an automobile collision. The trial court entered a summary judgment for the defendant on the basis that the cause of action was barred by the two year statute of limitations. The plaintiff asserts that an issue of fact was raised by reason of representations made by a claims adjuster employed by the defendant’s insurance carrier. The judgment will be reversed and the case remanded.

On September 5, 1975 the plaintiff filed this suit, which is based on an automobile accident occurring on December 27,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. MacKeen v. KasinskasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Hayes v. GessnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Hurley v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Neeley v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Walker v. HanesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Cook v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  4. Forrest v. Vital Earth Resources, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  5. Zimmerman v. First American Title Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API