Legal Opinion

Aerolineas Argentinas v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 24, 1994No. Nos. 92-9C, 92-481CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINSTEIN, Judge.

Order1

Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaints of plaintiffs Aerolíneas Argentinas and Pakistan International Airlines (“Aerolí-neas” and “PIA,” respectively; “the airlines,” collectively) for failure to state a claim over which this court has jurisdiction. After oral argument, the motions are granted.

Facts

When deciding a motion to dismiss, the court “must assume each well-pled factual allegation to be true and indulge in all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmovant.” Owen v. United States, 851 F.2d 1404, 1407 (Fed.Cir.1988); see Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232,…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aerolineas Argentinas, and Pakistan International Airlines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. Maniere v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  3. Thermalon Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  4. Trauma Service Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  5. Linea Area Nacional De Chile S.A. v. MeissnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API