Aerolineas Argentinas v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WEINSTEIN, Judge.
Order1
Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaints of plaintiffs Aerolíneas Argentinas and Pakistan International Airlines (“Aerolí-neas” and “PIA,” respectively; “the airlines,” collectively) for failure to state a claim over which this court has jurisdiction. After oral argument, the motions are granted.
Facts
When deciding a motion to dismiss, the court “must assume each well-pled factual allegation to be true and indulge in all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmovant.” Owen v. United States, 851 F.2d 1404, 1407 (Fed.Cir.1988); see Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232,…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aerolineas Argentinas, and Pakistan International Airlines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Maniere v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Thermalon Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Trauma Service Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Linea Area Nacional De Chile S.A. v. MeissnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.