Legal Opinion

Melander v. County of Freeborn

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 1927No. Nos. 25,795, 25,796PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiffs appealed from an adverse judgment in each of the two actions which are here on the same record.

The county is defendant in both actions and plaintiffs are adjoining riparian owners. Certain taxpayers intervened. Freeborn lake is a meandered navigable body of water covering an area of 1,800 acres with a watershed of 7,300 acres. It is subjected to the usual public use. A part of plaintiffs’ lands which adjoin the lake is low but usually tillable and a part usually marshy and not tillable. The latter is flooded during wet seasons and at times when the water is extremely high in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Stenberg v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Shterk v. VeitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Martin v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henkel v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. In Re Lake Elysian High-Water LevelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. Bekkemo v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Clarke v. WenzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API