Legal Opinion
Alter v. DBLKM, INC.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 20, 1993No. Civ. A. 90-M-1981PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MATSCH, Judge.
Defendants DBLKM, Inc. (“DBLKM”), Kutak, Rock & Campbell (“Kutak”), AmWest Development I Limited Partnership (“Am-West I”) and AmWest Development Corporation (“AmWest Corp.”) moved pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended complaint alleging claims for relief under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, the civil liability provisions of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68, the Colorado…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Rosenthal v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- O'Neil v. AppelDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
- People v. ChausseeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Seidl v. Greentree Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.