In re Pfeiffer Silk Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, District Judge.
Mindlin & Rosenman, Inc., petitioned the court for a rule on the trustees to show cause why they should not turn over certain machinery in their possession to the petitioner. A rule to show cause was granted. Answers were filed by the trustees, by the Monroe County National Bank of East Stroudsburg, and by the First Stroudsburg National Bank. The issue raised came before David Rosenthal, Esq., as special master, who filed his report and recommended that the trustees be ordered to turn over to the Petitioner certain machinery, namely: “42 Cone Winders style 50 6 sp.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holt v. HenleySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Central Lithograph Co. v. Eatmor Chocolate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Detroit Steel Cooperage Co. v. Sistersville Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
3Cited by2 opinions
- AMF, Inc. v. Bavitz (In re Bavitz)District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- In re Penn Brewing Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1937