Legal Opinion

People v. Morgan

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 2005No. C045006PublishedCited by 16 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORRISON, J.

In this case we consider a question that has in trigued and divided sóholars of the law of evidence, namely, whether implied assertions are hearsay. Here, the question arises in a common context. While officers were executing a search warrant for evidence of possession of a controlled substance for sale, an officer answers the phone and hears the caller ask to buy drugs. Are the caller’s questions and statements hearsay? We conclude that under the provisions of California’s Evidence Code the caller’s oral expressions are hearsay, but that case law, recognized and accepted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Tennessee v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. People v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. United States v. Keith D. Long, United States of America v. Sonia E. MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Commonwealth, Aplt v. Koch, A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. United States v. Manuel Jesus Valle-MontalboCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Benjamin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API