Legal Opinion
Estrada v. Potomac Electric Power Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 13, 1985No. 84-44PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Per curiam
This case comes before us on appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. We affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed in the appended opinion of the trial court, per the Honorable George Herbert Goodrich, filed November 28, 1983, which opinion is incorporated herein.
MEMORANDUM OPINION ÁND ORDER
Facts:
On July 31, 1979, at approximately 7:20 p.m., plaintiffs Shell Estrada, age 11, and Andrew Canter, * age 12, were severely burned by an electrical discharge inside defendant Potomac Electric and Power Company’s (PEPCO) Wildecroft Substation at 6904 Riverdale Road, Lanham,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kilberg v. Northeast Airlines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Bernhard v. Harrah's ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Ross v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Frederick O. Gaither v. Charles R. Myers and American Motorist Insurance Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- District of Columbia v. ColemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Rong Yao Zhou v. Jennifer Mall Restaurant, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Nepera Chemical, Inc. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Stutsman v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.