Legal Opinion

Patrick v. Goolsby

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

This is an ejectment suit involving title to a ninety-two-acre tract of land.

The Chancellor held that the defendant had perfected his title to the tract by adverse possession, and dismissed the bill. The Court of Appeals reversed the Chancellor, except as to six or seven acres, which it held that the defendant had perfected his title to by actual enclosure for the statutory period.

About 1906 one of the defendant’s predecessors in title enclosed about five acres of this tract and used it for a pasture. In the spring of 1909' his successor in title enlarged the enclosure to about seven acres,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kittel v. StegerTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Allis v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Stull v. Rich Patch Iron Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harrison v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  2. Pedro Reyes Trejo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API