Legal Opinion

Mirlis v. Greer

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 3, 2020No. 19-119Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-119 Mirlis v. Greer, et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Myers v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. Bolmer v. OliveiraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. Lora v. O'HEANEYCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API