King v. King
New York Supreme Court
Motion by plaintiff for interlocutory judgment of divorce upon the verdict of a jury in his favor upon issues settled and directed to be tried by a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The answer of the defendant denies the commission of the acts of adultery charged in the complaint, and alleges as a defense that such adultery, if committed, was committed by defendant through the procurement, connivance and privity of the plaintiff, and that the same had been condoned by the plaintiff.
These issues were by order directed to be tried by a jury. The jury found upon each of them in favor of the plaintiff. The plaintiff contends that all the issues having been tried this court at Special Term may render an interlocutory judgment as upon a motion, as provided by section 1225 of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McClave v. . GibbNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Lowenthal v. . LowenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Horn v. HornNew York Supreme Court · 1911