East Alabama Frozen Foods & Provision Co. v. Howell
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This case was tried on count 1, of the-complaint as amended. In legal effect there-is no material difference between the count-before and after it was amended. It is-based on the theory that plaintiff was an invitee upon defendant’s premises. He was. a meat inspector and defendant operated a. slaughterhouse for killing and processing; cows. In making an inspection plaintiff slipped on a slick floor and was injured. The claim was that defendant was negligent in not providing a reasonably safe-place in which plaintiff was to perform his. duty as inspector for the public health…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lamson & Sessions Bolt Co. v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Farmers' & Merchants' Warehouse Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Ten Ball Novelty & Manufacturing Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Cox v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Opelika Montgomery Fair Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951