Legal Opinion

East Alabama Frozen Foods & Provision Co. v. Howell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 27, 1952No. 5 Div. 532Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This case was tried on count 1, of the-complaint as amended. In legal effect there-is no material difference between the count-before and after it was amended. It is-based on the theory that plaintiff was an invitee upon defendant’s premises. He was. a meat inspector and defendant operated a. slaughterhouse for killing and processing; cows. In making an inspection plaintiff slipped on a slick floor and was injured. The claim was that defendant was negligent in not providing a reasonably safe-place in which plaintiff was to perform his. duty as inspector for the public health…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lamson & Sessions Bolt Co. v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Farmers' & Merchants' Warehouse Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Ten Ball Novelty & Manufacturing Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Cox v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Opelika Montgomery Fair Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API