Pelts v. Pelts
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCourtney Hudson Goodson, Justice
I disagree with the majority’s decision to reverse the circuit court’s division of appellant Gregory Pelts’s military retirement pay pursuant to the parties’ divorce. Thus, I must dissent from that portion of the opinion.
During the divorce proceeding, appellee Shelly Pelts’s entitlement to a marital portion of Gregory’s military retirement was the primary issue in dispute. Shelly testified that she was entitled to one-half of the marital portion of Gregory’s military retirement benefits based on the fact that he had served in the military throughout their entire twenty-] 7three-year marriage.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Askins v. AskinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- In Re the Marriage of BeckmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.