Legal Opinion
Whitney Trust & Savings Bank v. Jurgens-Fowler Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided July 2, 1934No. 32281PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’NIELL, Chief Justice.
This is a suit on a promissory note. The note is for $7,500, and is signed by JurgensFowler Company, Inc., per George B. Jurgens, president, and T. Walter Fowler, vice president, and is indorsed by Jurgens and Fowler, individually. The suit is against the corporation as maker of the note and Jurgens as indorser. Judgment was rendered against them, in solido, for the amount of the note, with the stipulated interest and' attorneys’ fee. They have appealed from the decision.
In their answer to the suit, the defendants ■acknowledged the signature and indorsement •of the note…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Israel v. State Nat. BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. American Bank & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Dement v. Red River Valley BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- First National City Bank v. Compania De Aguaceros, S. A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
- Couvillon v. Whitney Nat. Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- McKenzie & Mouk, Inc. v. Ouachita National Bank in MonroeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963