Legal Opinion

Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc. v. Baker

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided January 18, 1926No. 578Published

1Opinion of the Court

Taulane, J.,

This is a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence.

The suit is on a promissory note made and delivered by the defendant at Ocean City, New Jersey, for $6000 and payable to the order of the plaintiff on Sept. 1, 1925, at the First National Bank, Ocean City, New Jersey.

*287The defence is that at the time of the execution and delivery of the note, and as an inducement thereto, the plaintiff orally agreed with the defendant that “if said maker (defendant) should pay $1000, together with the entire interest upon said note, at maturity, plaintiff would then renew said…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Gandy v. WeckerlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. City of St. Louis v. United Railways Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  4. Musser v. StaufferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Evans v. EdelsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API