Legal Opinion

Betts v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 13, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Lee District Court. — Hon W. S. Withrow, Judge. Action on alleged contract resulted in judgment as prayed. Tbe defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd, L-

Plaintiff shipped a carload of mules from Grundy Center, billed -over the Chicago, Bock Island & Pacific Bailway to Burlington, and from there over the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Bailroad to East St. Louis, 111. Between Burlington and Keokuk seven mules were injured, and plaintiff alleged in his petition that upon discovering their condition he telegraphed defendant’s superintendent; that he turned the shipment over to the company, and that subsequently, by virtue of an agreement with it, he received all but two mules upon the company’s promise to pay him $381.50 for these, their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Latta v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. McLagan v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Caligiuri Ex Rel. Caligiuri v. Des Moines Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. OsborneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  3. Cramer v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Cedar Rapids Fuel Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Blair v. Wells-Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API