Legal Opinion

Tevington v. International Milling Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided September 7, 1945No. Civil Action No. 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves under Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to require the defendant International Milling Company to furnish a bill of particulars of its affirmative defenses, to wit: contributory negligence and negligence on the part of fellow servants’.

The plaintiff mistakes his remedy. Section 12(e), supra, has doubtless been considered in more cases than has any other section of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. While earlier there were many divergent views as to the application of this section, the views of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walling v. Black Diamond Coal Mining Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1943
  2. Raudenbush v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Parker v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1944
  4. Walling v. American S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1945
  5. Braden v. CallawayDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Porter v. ReynoldsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API