Legal Opinion

Shapiro v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 4, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bigelow, V. C.

Complainant sues on a policy of insurance issued by defendant May 1st, 1930, upon the life of Barney Laden, who died one year later. Complainant asks a decree that defendant endorse the policy so as to designate complainant as beneficiary and that defendant pay to complainant the amount due on the policy. Defendant, by counter-claim, prays that the policy be canceled on the ground that it was fraudulently obtained by Barney Laden. The actual controversy arises upon the counter-claim and not upon the bill. Laden told the .company’s agent that he was forty-five years old;…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Great Southern Life Ins. Co. v. DoyleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
  2. Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  3. Great Southern Life Insurance v. DoyleTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Prudential Ins. Co. v. Merritt-ChapmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  5. Russ v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API