Sutherland v. Cybergenics Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Now before the court is defendants Cyber-genics Corporation and Matt Chamlin’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative to transfer, pursuant to Fed.R.Cxv.P. 12(b)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), respectively. As set forth more fully below, the court denies the defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, and grants defendants’ motion to transfer.
I. FACTS
Defendant Matt Chamlin (“Chamlin”) is the president of Cybergenics Corporation (“Cybergenics”) and works from an office in Westchester County, New York. Defendant Cybergenics…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Gypsum Co. v. All Tank Sales & Supply Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997