Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 11, 1961No. 5-2514PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeoroe Rose Smith, J.

This is a suit by the appellant to cancel a deed (conceded to have been in reality a mortgage) by which she and her late husband conveyed a 43-acre farm to the appellee, T. H. Johnson. The chancellor refused to cancel the instrument, holding that the debts secured by the equitable mortgage were neither usurious nor barred by limitations. This appeal is from a decree settling the accounts between the parties and ordering a foreclosure of the appellee’s lien for the balance found to be due.

The proof shows that in 1953 the appellant’s husband, T. E. Daniels, was indebted beyond his ability to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sturdivant v. McCorleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  2. Hughes v. HoldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Hynes v. StevensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schwarz v. Colonial Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Cagle v. Boyle Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Cagle v. Boyle Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995
  5. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. KramerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API