Legal Opinion

Stillman v. Donovan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 26, 1898PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Petition, for the review of a judgment for costs, obtained by the respondent against the petitioner in June, 1893, in an action of tort in the Superior Court. Hearing before Barker, J., who denied the petition; and the petitioner alleged exceptions. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, J.

In this case we have before us a single exception to an order of a justice of this court, dismissing a petition for a writ of review. The petition is founded on the proceedings at a trial before a jury in the Superior Court. The presiding justice at the trial was the late Mr. Justice Aldrich, a judge eminent for his learning and ability, and of long experience in the trial of causes. The petitioner avers that a part of the testimony at the trial was false, and that the judge made numerous errors of law, which altogether resulted in an erroneous verdict against him.

A writ of review is an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. HubleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Hayes v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Stillman v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. City of Quincy v. Brooks-Skinner, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Beserosky v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Silverstein v. Daniel Russell Boiler Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API